Sixyard logo

Eva Carneiro Responds to Mourinho and Terry's Claims

Eva Carneiro has reignited her dispute with José Mourinho and John Terry, accusing the pair of dragging her back into “the worst” chapter of her career after they revisited the 2015 row that led to her Chelsea exit.

The former Chelsea team doctor was name-checked in the new Netflix documentary “Mourinho,” where the then-manager again insisted Carneiro and head physio Jon Fearn were wrong to go onto the pitch to treat Eden Hazard during a 2-2 draw with Swansea City in August 2015.

Carneiro did not let it pass.

“11 years on and here we are reliving the worst. Hope they made some money,” she posted on X, making clear her anger at seeing the incident repackaged for the cameras more than a decade later.

Carneiro hits back at Terry

Her frustration was not reserved for Mourinho. Terry, Chelsea captain at the time, backed his former manager’s view in the documentary, saying there had been an understanding between players and medical staff that they would not enter the pitch unless an injury was “really, really bad.”

Carneiro publicly challenged that version.

“We are bound by a medico-legal code of conduct,” she wrote. “Genuinely it would be healthy for John Terry to learn the rules of the game. It’s been long enough mate.”

She also reposted a statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine, stressing that medical staff have an “absolute duty of care” to attend and assess a player when the referee requests it.

Then she laid out her account of that night in blunt terms.

“So IT IS really simple. Referee Michael Oliver called us on TWICE, player Eden Hazard requested medical assistance we then made eye contact from side line and he confirmed he needed medical assistance, TWICE.

“At that point my hands are bound as a medical professional.”

The flashpoint that changed everything

The incident came in the closing stages of Chelsea’s opening Premier League game of the 2015-16 season. Thibaut Courtois had already been sent off. When Carneiro and Fearn ran on to treat Hazard, the Belgian was obliged by the laws of the game to leave the pitch, leaving Chelsea down to nine men.

Mourinho exploded on the touchline and later in public. He branded Carneiro and Fearn “impulsive and naive” and claimed they did not “understand the game.”

In the documentary, he stands by that stance.

“I’m not a doctor but my eyes know when a player is injured and when a player is not injured,” Mourinho says. “I knew Eden was not injured but the doctors went on to the pitch and we were left with nine players.

“For me, a lady doctor is the same as a man doctor. So, as always, I used my vocabulary when I’m not happy.

“There are words in moments where the tension is very, very high.

“Normally, people with football culture, with football DNA or with a football background get over it in one second. In that case, it was different.”

Terry echoes the manager’s expectations in the film.

“Medically, José would say unless it’s really, really bad, then they’re not coming on,” Terry says. “That was the understanding of us as players, the medical staff, everyone bought into that.

“It was a big moment obviously and he took a lot of backlash for that.”

Legal fallout and unfinished business

The backlash was not confined to the dugout. Carneiro and Fearn were removed from first-team duties in the immediate aftermath of the Swansea game. Carneiro left the club the following month and launched legal proceedings against Chelsea for constructive dismissal, along with a separate claim against Mourinho.

The case reached an employment tribunal before Chelsea and Carneiro agreed a settlement in June 2016. The club issued an apology to her. Mourinho never did so publicly.

The Football Association cleared Mourinho in September 2015 of making discriminatory comments towards Carneiro during the incident. By December, with Chelsea’s title defence in ruins, he was sacked.

More than a decade on, the Netflix cameras have brought the controversy back to life. Carneiro’s response makes one thing clear: for her, this is not just old footage. It is a professional line she believes was crossed and, even now, badly misunderstood.