Como Claims Victory Over Hellas Verona in Tactical Showdown
Hellas Verona’s 0-1 home defeat to Como at Stadio Marcantonio Bentegodi was defined by territorial control and a single, well-constructed second-half action. In a Round 36 Serie A fixture overseen by Marco Di Bello, Como’s 64% possession and cleaner passing structure under Cesc Fabregas eventually broke a disciplined Verona block, with Anastasios Douvikas deciding the contest on 71 minutes. Paolo Sammarco’s 3-5-1-1 kept the game level until the interval and generated a similar shot volume to Como, but Verona’s inability to convert promising central positions into high-quality final actions left them chasing a game that tactically suited the visitors’ control-first approach.
The scoring sequence was simple and late. After a goalless first half in which neither side found a breakthrough, the decisive moment arrived at 71'. From open play, Como exploited their numerical superiority between the lines, with centre-back M. O. Kempf stepping in and providing the assist for A. Douvikas, whose finish put Como 0-1 ahead. With Verona’s back three drawn out, Douvikas’ movement into the inside channel punished a brief lapse in Verona’s compactness.
Disciplinary and Event Log
- 36' A. Moreno (IN) came on for A. Valle (OUT) — Como reshaped their left side early, hinting at a more aggressive use of full-backs in buildup.
- 46' I. Smolcic (IN) came on for M. Vojvoda (OUT) — Como refreshed the right side of their back line at halftime.
- 46' M. Caqueret (IN) came on for M. Perrone (OUT) — a key shift towards more control in the double pivot.
- 46' M. Baturina (IN) came on for J. Rodriguez (OUT) — Como added creativity in the advanced midfield line.
- 61' Maxence Caqueret (Como) — Persistent fouling (Yellow Card).
- 63' S. Lovric (IN) came on for A. Bernede (OUT) — Verona sought more verticality and forward running from midfield.
- 71' Goal: A. Douvikas (Como), assisted by M. O. Kempf — Normal Goal.
- 80' Isaac (IN) came on for J. Akpa Akpro (OUT) — Verona increased attacking presence, adjusting their midfield balance.
- 81' I. Vermesan (IN) came on for R. Belghali (OUT) — another attacking substitution from Verona, targeting wide and half-space threat.
- 81' I. Van der Brempt (IN) came on for A. Diao (OUT) — Como added defensive energy and fresh legs on the flank.
- 89' Martin Frese (Hellas Verona) — Foul (Yellow Card).
Card verification: Hellas Verona: 1, Como: 1, Total: 2.
Tactically, the game was a clear clash of structures: Verona’s 3-5-1-1 versus Como’s 4-2-3-1. Verona’s back three of N. Valentini, A. Edmundsson and V. Nelsson allowed them to defend deep with numbers and protect the central corridor. Wing-backs M. Frese and R. Belghali were tasked with wide coverage, but also with providing Verona’s width in transition. In front of them, R. Gagliardini, J. Akpa Akpro and A. Bernede formed a compact central trio, with T. Suslov as a support striker behind K. Bowie.
This structure produced an organized low-to-mid block that limited Como to 11 total shots, exactly matching Verona’s own total. However, the territorial imbalance was stark: Verona had just 36% possession and completed 277 passes, 202 accurate (73%). Their attacks were necessarily more direct, relying on Bowie’s runs in behind and Suslov’s ability to receive between the lines. The wing-backs provided width, but with only 3 shots on goal from 11 attempts, Verona struggled to transform their 0.97 xG into truly clear chances.
Como’s 4-2-3-1 under Fabregas was built for control. The back four of A. Valle (then A. Moreno), M. O. Kempf, Diego Carlos and M. Vojvoda (then I. Smolcic) provided a solid platform, with full-backs stepping into higher lanes in possession. The double pivot initially of M. Perrone and L. Da Cunha, then crucially including M. Caqueret from 46', gave Como a stable rest-defense and better progression. Ahead of them, A. Diao, N. Paz and J. Rodriguez (then M. Baturina) supported lone striker A. Douvikas.
The halftime triple substitution was a major tactical inflection point. Introducing Caqueret, Smolcic and Baturina increased Como’s technical level and pressing intensity. Caqueret’s yellow card for “Persistent fouling” at 61' was a direct by-product of his role as an aggressive controller in midfield, repeatedly stepping in to break Verona’s counters. Baturina, operating between Verona’s lines, helped stretch the 3-5-1-1 vertically and horizontally, forcing Verona’s central midfield to defend deeper and limiting their ability to spring transitions.
The decisive goal at 71' reflected Como’s improved structure. With Verona’s block compressed, Kempf advanced from centre-back, exploiting the space in front of Verona’s midfield. Douvikas’ movement away from the central defenders created a passing lane, and the combination punished Verona’s brief hesitation in tracking the runner. From that point, Sammarco’s substitutions — S. Lovric, Isaac and I. Vermesan — tilted Verona into a more attacking 3-4-3/3-4-1-2 shape, but at the cost of some midfield stability.
In goal, both keepers had symmetrical headline numbers but under different tactical pressures. J. Butez for Como made 3 saves behind a team that controlled 64% of the ball and conceded only 0.97 xG, reflecting a well-protected penalty area and effective possession-based defending. L. Montipo also registered 3 saves, but did so in a side spending longer spells without the ball and defending deeper. Both teams registered the same “goals prevented” value of 0.73, underlining that this was not a game of goalkeeping heroics but of structural control and one decisive attacking pattern.
Statistically, Como’s superiority in possession (64% to 36%) and passing — 506 passes, 442 accurate (87%) versus Verona’s 277, 202 accurate (73%) — maps cleanly onto the tactical picture. Yet the xG values (Verona 0.97, Como 0.9) suggest that Verona’s more sporadic attacks were almost as dangerous as Como’s more sustained pressure. Both sides had 11 total shots and 3 blocked efforts, with Como edging shots on goal 4-3 and generating more presence inside the box (10 shots inside versus Verona’s 8).
Discipline was relatively controlled: 17 fouls for Verona, 14 for Como, and only two yellow cards — Maxence Caqueret for “Persistent fouling” and Martin Frese for “Foul.” That low card count aligns with a match more about positional maneuvering than outright physicality.
In the broader context, Verona’s Overall Form and Defensive Index from this performance suggest a team structurally solid but overly reactive, capable of limiting chances but struggling to impose themselves against possession-heavy opponents. Como’s Overall Form profile is that of a side increasingly comfortable dictating tempo and territory; their Defensive Index here is strong, combining high pass accuracy, controlled fouling and effective box protection. The narrow 0-1 scoreline ultimately reflects a tactical contest where Como’s control-first plan, sharpened by impactful halftime changes, found the one clean solution that Verona’s more conservative structure could not match.
Related News

Cagliari vs Udinese: A Clinical 2-0 Victory Highlights Contrasting Seasons

Fiorentina vs Genoa: Tactical Analysis of Goalless Draw

Cremonese Dominates Pisa 3–0 in Serie A Match

Como Claims Victory Over Hellas Verona in Tactical Showdown

Atalanta Edges AC Milan 3-2 in Dramatic Serie A Clash

Torino Edges Sassuolo in Tactical Battle